[Bug middle-end/48752] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[Bug middle-end/48752] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

           Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge
                    at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: danglin@gcc.gnu.org
              Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
            Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
             Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11


/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc
-nos
tdinc++ -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/test/gn
u/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.7
/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bin/ -B/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.7/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/lib/
-i
system /opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.7/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/include -isystem
/opt/gnu/gcc/
gcc-4.7/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/sys-include    -x c++-header -nostdinc++ -g -O2
-I
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux
11.11 -I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/test/
gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -O2 -g -std=gnu++0x
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc
++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h \
        -o hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/in
clude/unordered_set:46:0,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.
h:115:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unordered_s
et.h:398:1: internal compiler error: vector VEC(tree,base) index domain error,
i
n evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

-bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -v
Reading specs from ./specs
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=./lto-wrapper
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/gnu/bin/as
--enable-shared --with-local-prefix=/opt/gnu --prefix=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.7
--with-gmp=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.7 --enable-threads=posix --enable-debug=no
--disable-nls --without-cloog --without-ppl
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,java,ada,obj-c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110424 (experimental) [trunk revision 172909] (GCC) 

Revision 172860 was ok.

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-24 13:49:30 UTC ---
Attached .ii file.

Dave

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-04-24 18:27:20 UTC ---
evaulate?!?

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-24 19:13:22 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-04-24 18:27:20 UTC ---
> evaulate?!?

I believe it must be Czech...

Dave

Re: [Bug middle-end/48752] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[Jan Hubicka]

Hi,
I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still reproduce for you?

Honza

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-04-24 19:43:44 UTC ---
Hi,
I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still
reproduce for you?

Honza

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-24 20:24:00 UTC ---
> I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still
> reproduce for you?

I noticed that and started a couple of new builds.  Should know in a couple
of hours.

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-25 01:27:59 UTC ---
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, John David Anglin wrote:

> > I've comitted patch for bug with similar symptoms today. Does it still
> > reproduce for you?
> 
> I noticed that and started a couple of new builds.  Should know in a couple
> of hours.

The bug is still there.

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-26 01:57:57 UTC ---
ICE occurs at i==2.

Breakpoint 1, evaulate_conditions_for_edge (e=0x78730cf0, inline_p=1 '\001') at
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c:481
481               tree val = VEC_index (tree, known_vals, c->operand_num);
(gdb) p i
$6 = 2
(gdb) p *c
$7 = {val = 0x0, operand_num = 1, code = ERROR_MARK}
(gdb) p *known_vals
$9 = {base = {num = 1, alloc = 1, vec = {0x7af2ab28}}}
(gdb) p debug_tree (e->callee->decl)
 <function_decl 785c4b80
_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii.constprop.19
    type <function_type 7861ae40
        type <void_type 7af3b840 void type_6 VOID
            align 8 symtab 3 alias set -1 canonical type 7af3b840
            pointer_to_this <pointer_type 7af3b8a0>>
        SI
        size <integer_cst 7af2a438 constant 32>
        unit size <integer_cst 7af2a270 constant 4>
        align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 7861ae40
        arg-types <tree_list 7897d540 value <integer_type 7af3b2a0 int>
            chain <tree_list 7af2ad80 value <void_type 7af3b840 void>>>
        pointer_to_this <pointer_type 78625000>>
    addressable used static in_system_header decl_5 SI file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unordered_set.h
line 398 col 1 align 32 initial <block 785a8ea8>
    arguments <parm_decl 785aa160 __initialize_p
        type <integer_type 7af3b2a0 int public type_6 SI size <integer_cst
7af2a438 32> unit size <integer_cst 7af2a270 4>
            align 32 symtab 8 alias set 5 canonical type 7af3b2a0 precision 32
min <integer_cst 7af2a3f0 -2147483648> max <integer_cst 7af2a408 2147483647>
            pointer_to_this <pointer_type 7af3bc00> reference_to_this
<reference_type 7ad73c60>>
        used SI file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unordered_set.h
line 398 col 1 size <integer_cst 7af2a438 32> unit size <integer_cst 7af2a270
4>
        align 32 context <function_decl 78c18100
__static_initialization_and_destruction_0> arg-type <integer_type 7af3b2a0 int>
        chain <parm_decl 785aa1b8 __priority type <integer_type 7af3b2a0 int>
            used SI file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unordered_set.h
line 398 col 1 size <integer_cst 7af2a438 32> unit size <integer_cst 7af2a270
4>
            align 32 context <function_decl 78c18100
__static_initialization_and_destruction_0> arg-type <integer_type 7af3b2a0
int>>>
    result <result_decl 785ac000 D.108176 type <void_type 7af3b840 void>
        ignored VOID file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unordered_set.h
line 398 col 1
        align 8 context <function_decl 78c18100
__static_initialization_and_destruction_0>>
    full-name "void
_Z41__static_initialization_and_destruction_0ii.constprop.19(int)"
    pending-inline-info 785a8ee0>
$16 = void
(gdb) p debug_tree (e->caller->decl)
 <function_decl 785c4c00
_GLOBAL__I_65535_0__test_gnu_gcc_gcc_libstdc___v3_include_precompiled_stdc__.h_E828EBE2_059ED766
    type <function_type 7af478a0
        type <void_type 7af3b840 void type_6 VOID
            align 8 symtab 3 alias set -1 canonical type 7af3b840
            pointer_to_this <pointer_type 7af3b8a0>>
        type_6 SI
        size <integer_cst 7af2a438 constant 32>
        unit size <integer_cst 7af2a270 constant 4>
        align 32 symtab 420 alias set -1 canonical type 7af478a0
        arg-types <tree_list 7af2ad80 value <void_type 7af3b840 void>>
        pointer_to_this <pointer_type 79db9e40>>
    used public static in_system_header preserve SI file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unordered_set.h
line 398 col 1 align 32 initial <block 785b0c78>
    result <result_decl 78605dc0 D.108737 type <void_type 7af3b840 void>
        VOID file
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/unordered_set.h
line 398 col 1
        align 8 context <function_decl 785c4c00
_GLOBAL__I_65535_0__test_gnu_gcc_gcc_libstdc___v3_include_precompiled_stdc__.h_E828EBE2_059ED766>>
    struct-function 79bc1580>

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-26 02:30:52 UTC ---
Looks like the issue is somehow caused by caller being a global
constructor.

I believe it should be possible to reproduce with a cross.

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-04-26 13:06:08 UTC ---
> Looks like the issue is somehow caused by caller being a global
> constructor.

Hmm, yes, it is entirely possible - when new functions are added, we need to
analyze them.
I tought it is happening now, but it is not.  I will check it.

Honza

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-26 17:59:49 UTC ---
Hi,
the testcase doesn't seem to work for me.  I get
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/cctype:43:0,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h:36:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bits/c++config.h:159:20:
error: typedef 'std::decltype' is initialized (use decltype instead)
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bits/c++config.h:159:20:
error: 'nullptr' was not declared in this scope
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/cmath:44:0,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h:42:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:185:25:
error: 'char16_t' was not declared in this scope
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:185:33:
error: template argument 1 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:192:25:
error: 'char32_t' was not declared in this scope
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:192:33:
error: template argument 1 is invalid
In file included from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/iosfwd:41:0,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ios:39,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/istream:40,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/sstream:39,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/complex:47,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/ccomplex:42,
                 from
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h:53:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:76:33:
error: 'char16_t' was not declared in this scope
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:76:41:
error: template argument 1 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:77:33:
error: 'char32_t' was not declared in this scope
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:77:41:
error: template argument 1 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:79:24:
error: 'char16_t' was not declared in this scope
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:79:32:
error: template argument 1 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:79:32:
error: template argument 2 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:79:32:
error: template argument 3 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:79:43:
error: invalid type in declaration before ';' token
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:80:24:
error: 'char32_t' was not declared in this scope
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:80:32:
error: template argument 1 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:80:32:
error: template argument 2 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:80:32:
error: template argument 3 is invalid
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stringfwd.h:80:43:
error: invalid type in declaration before ';' token
and more...
on comipler configure as:
configure --target=hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-bootstrap

Any clue what is wrong?
After dinner I will try to look into the add_new_function path and figure out
why summaries are not computed as they should.

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-26 18:11:43 UTC ---
> Any clue what is wrong?
> After dinner I will try to look into the add_new_function path and figure out
> why summaries are not computed as they should.

These are the args I used in debugging cc1plus with the testcase: 

-fpreprocessed stdc++.ii -quiet -dumpbase stdc++.h -auxbase stdc++ -g -g -O2
-O2 -std=gnu++0x -version -o stdc++.s --output-pch=
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2ggnu++0x.gch

Does that help?

Dave

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-04-27 07:46:00 UTC ---
Hi,
this patch is not really tested, I need to construct a testcase that reproduces
fo rme, but it
adds the mising add_new_function hook and should solve the problem.

Honza

Index: ipa-prop.c
===================================================================
*** ipa-prop.c    (revision 172989)
--- ipa-prop.c    (working copy)
*************** static struct cgraph_edge_hook_list *edg
*** 63,68 ****
--- 63,69 ----
  static struct cgraph_node_hook_list *node_removal_hook_holder;
  static struct cgraph_2edge_hook_list *edge_duplication_hook_holder;
  static struct cgraph_2node_hook_list *node_duplication_hook_holder;
+ static struct cgraph_node_hook_list *function_insertion_hook_holder;

  /* Add cgraph NODE described by INFO to the worklist WL regardless of whether
     it is in one or not.  It should almost never be used directly, as opposed
to
*************** ipa_node_duplication_hook (struct cgraph
*** 2058,2063 ****
--- 2059,2073 ----
    new_info->node_enqueued = old_info->node_enqueued;
  }

+ 
+ /* Analyze newly added function into callgraph.  */
+ 
+ static void
+ ipa_add_new_function (struct cgraph_node *node, void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+ {
+   ipa_analyze_node (node);
+ }
+ 
  /* Register our cgraph hooks if they are not already there.  */

  void
*************** ipa_register_cgraph_hooks (void)
*** 2075,2080 ****
--- 2085,2092 ----
    if (!node_duplication_hook_holder)
      node_duplication_hook_holder =
        cgraph_add_node_duplication_hook (&ipa_node_duplication_hook, NULL);
+   function_insertion_hook_holder =
+       cgraph_add_function_insertion_hook (&ipa_add_new_function, NULL);
  }

  /* Unregister our cgraph hooks if they are not already there.  */
*************** ipa_unregister_cgraph_hooks (void)
*** 2090,2095 ****
--- 2102,2109 ----
    edge_duplication_hook_holder = NULL;
    cgraph_remove_node_duplication_hook (node_duplication_hook_holder);
    node_duplication_hook_holder = NULL;
+   cgraph_remove_function_insertion_hook (function_insertion_hook_holder);
+   function_insertion_hook_holder = NULL;
  }

  /* Allocate all necessary data structures necessary for indirect inlining. 
*/

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-27 07:30:36 UTC ---
Hi,
the problem is that ipa-prop is not really looking for newly inserted
functions. So inliner knows about the arguments but asks the ipa-prop machinery
that doesn't. I will add the missing add_new_function hook.

I still can't reproduce the testcase but I guess I can make one myself just by
forcing global constructor.  Will try to have patch before lunch.

Will also fix my dyslectic Czenglish ;)

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 15:20:32 UTC ---
> I still can't reproduce the testcase but I guess I can make one myself just by
> forcing global constructor.  Will try to have patch before lunch.

I realized last night that I could probably find a simpler testcase
by running the C testsuite.

Dave

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-04-27 16:04:21 UTC ---
Hi,
I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree.  Could you please give it a
try?
Thanks,
Honza

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 21:08:26 UTC ---
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:

> I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree.  Could you please give it a
> try?

Bug is still present in revision 173047.  Running C testsuite.

Dave

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #17 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-30 01:38:18 UTC ---
I didn't find a simpler testcase running the C testsuite.

The following cross build commands allow me to duplicate the problem on
i686-apple-darwin9 with the compiler args shown in comment #11:

../gcc/configure --disable-shared --disable-nls --enable-multiarch
--disable-threads --disable-libgcc --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp
--disable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --build=i686-apple-darwin9
--host=i686-apple-darwin9 --target=hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 --enable-languages=c++
--disable-bootstrap &&
make BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O0" CFLAGS="-g -O0" &&

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-30 08:19:25 UTC ---
Thanks. The missing bit was  -std=gnu++0x, now it reproduces for me. Sorry for
the confussion.

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-04-30 08:46:55 UTC ---
Hi,
i am atesting the attached fix.

Index: ipa-inline.c
===================================================================
--- ipa-inline.c    (revision 173189)
+++ ipa-inline.c    (working copy)
@@ -1663,6 +1663,14 @@ early_inliner (void)
   if (seen_error ())
     return 0;

+  /* Do nothing if datastructures for ipa-inliner are already computed.  This
happens when
+     some pass decides to construct new function and cgraph_add_new_function
calls lowering
+     passes and early optimization on it.  This may confuse ourself when early
inliner decide
+     to inline call to function clone, because function clones don't have
parameter list
+     in ipa-prop matching their signature.  */
+  if (ipa_node_params_vector)
+    return 0;
+
 #ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
   verify_cgraph_node (node);
 #endif

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.04.30 10:59:32
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-30 10:59:32 UTC ---
Is the problem fixed now?

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-30 11:01:29 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Apr 30 11:01:26 2011
New Revision: 173211

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173211
Log:

    PR middle-end/48752 
    * ipa-inline.c (early_inliner): Disable when doing late
    addition of function.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/ipa-inline.c

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #22 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-01 01:48:39 UTC ---
Thanks, bug is fixed.