From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9325 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2012 13:09:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 8974 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Oct 2012 13:09:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:09:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE57290074; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:09:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3C+DJPpJE3BH; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:09:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from chelles.act-europe.fr (chelles.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.160]) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB69F290069; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:09:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by chelles.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525) id B35BF1EA005A; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:09:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:09:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug bootstrap/54820] [4.8 Regression] ada: cannot find -lstdc++ since 4.8.0 20121002 Message-ID: <20121009130928.GA5729@adacore.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00813.txt.bz2 > > On that machine, the entire user-space is built without any static > > libstdc++ > > libraries, so it's quite annoying (and unexpected) to have to install > > them for > > Ada bootstrap. Couldn't Ada use the g++/libstdc++ bits from the compiler > > being > > built? > > No, this is stage 1 so the libstdc++ of the base compiler must be used. Well, we could first build g++ and libstdc++, and then Ada I guess, but that's probably too ambitious. > In the > end, requiring a static libstdc++ is probably overzealous and should be > dropped. Annoying for other reasons, but fine with me, feel free to make that change. Arno