From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.16])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA798393BC0B;
 Mon,  7 Dec 2020 10:47:21 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org CA798393BC0B
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=none smtp.mailfrom=hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz
Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202)
 id 449AF282634; Mon,  7 Dec 2020 11:47:18 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:47:18 +0100
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug c++/91241] [8/9/10/11 Regression] internal compiler error:
 symtab_node::verify failed
Message-ID: <20201207104718.GC51358@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <bug-91241-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-91241-4-YSvjodTi1I@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bug-91241-4-YSvjodTi1I@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:47:23 -0000

> @Marek: The callgraph checking error is correct.
> If you disable it, you will likely see duplicate assembler names in GAS. And
> that's the error that 2 symbol names clash.
Indeed, there are two lambdas, but I think C++ FE should assign them
different symbol names.

Honza