From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.16]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BA23851C07; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:12:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 90BA23851C07 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ucw.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202) id 2C9042807BA; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:12:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:12:27 +0100 From: Jan Hubicka To: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug middle-end/99097] profiledbootstrap fails with LTO and disabled plugin Message-ID: <20210215101227.GA53993@kam.mff.cuni.cz> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:12:31 -0000 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99097 > > --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > > > I've just tried to reproduce it: > > > ../configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto --enable-checking=release > > > --disable-plugin > > > > > > But the build is fine for me. > > Ah, my bad, I used BFD. > > > On our dhcp230 (zen III machine) it works if you make system linker ld, > > if system linker is gold (from tumbleweed) it fails > > > > GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.36.50.20210211) 1.16 > > Note that this isn't ld.gold from openSUSE Tumbleweed. We still have 2.35.1 > release in the distribution. This must be a built gold from source files? Ah, you are right. It is binutils trunk (unpatched). Will figure out what is going on here. Honza