From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.16])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724143858018;
 Tue,  2 Nov 2021 19:57:25 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 724143858018
Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202)
 id 019FC28270D; Tue,  2 Nov 2021 20:57:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 20:57:23 +0100
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
To: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug d/103040] [12 Regression] gdc.dg/torture/pr101273.d FAILs
Message-ID: <20211102195723.GB30167@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <bug-103040-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-103040-4-NeAfWEMNJ0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bug-103040-4-NeAfWEMNJ0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:57:27 -0000

> See above comments from Iain, even if that pre-initialization is removed it is
> still miscompiled.  And, the testcase fails not because of the padding bits not
> being zero, but because the address of self stored into one of the fields isn't
> there or modref thinks it can't be changed or set to that.  But for
> corresponding C++ it handles it ok.
Perhaps TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the type which is being used to test whether
return slot pointer may escape.