From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Received: from nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz [195.113.20.16])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C513857C5D;
 Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:54:14 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A8C513857C5D
Received: by nikam.ms.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 16202)
 id 72A542805B6; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:54:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:54:13 +0100
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
To: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug ipa/103267] Wrong code with ipa-sra
Message-ID: <20211116085413.GG71052@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <bug-103267-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
 <bug-103267-4-1XGdTzI16y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bug-103267-4-1XGdTzI16y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,
 SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:54:16 -0000

> @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
> -static int
>  __attribute__ ((noinline,const))
>  infinite (int p)
>  {
Just for a record, it crahes with or without static int here for me :)

I run across it because the code tracking must access in ipa-sra is IMO
conceptually wrong.  I noticed that because ipa-modref solves similar
problem for kills (both need to verify that given access will always
happen).  The post-dominance check is not enough to verify that because
earlier function calls can do things like EH.  I failed to construct an
actual testcase because on interesting stuff like EH we punt for other
reasons (missed fnspec annotations on EH builtins).  I will play with it
more today.