From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7264 invoked by alias); 29 May 2010 13:30:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 7249 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2010 13:30:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 May 2010 13:30:35 +0000 Received: by pwi5 with SMTP id 5so1003512pwi.20 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 06:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.21.20 with SMTP id y20mr1462642wai.84.1275139832442; Sat, 29 May 2010 06:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.54.40.224] ([166.205.138.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c22sm29473918wam.18.2010.05.29.06.30.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 29 May 2010 06:30:31 -0700 (PDT) References: <20100529115002.28981.qmail@sourceware.org> Message-Id: <223AA8FC-4FBB-4362-8CB4-B720A01EB04E@gmail.com> From: Andrew Pinski To: "gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org" In-Reply-To: <20100529115002.28981.qmail@sourceware.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18) Subject: Re: [Bug target/44290] [4.5 Regression] arm linux kernel crahes when built with -fipa-sra, __naked attribute is broken Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 13:30:00 -0000 Cc: "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg03207.txt.bz2 The naked attribute should cause two things noinline and noclone. Sent from my iPhone On May 29, 2010, at 4:50 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > > > ------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-29 > 11:50 ------- > (it seems quite stupid to have naked functions with only an asm > inside in the > first place - you can equally well use plain assembly) > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44290 >