From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-310157-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11010 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2010 10:38:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 10985 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2010 10:38:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:38:24 +0000
Received: by pwi5 with SMTP id 5so1341659pwi.20         for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:38:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.57.11 with SMTP id f11mr2402081rva.39.1267439902231;         Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:38:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?10.107.68.102? ([166.205.139.186])         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm3605895pzk.15.2010.03.01.02.38.20         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);         Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:38:21 -0800 (PST)
References: <bug-43213-16926@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> <20100301102921.3215.qmail@sourceware.org>
Message-Id: <38F97FEC-D61C-437A-A82D-9B1EECAB385B@gmail.com>
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
To: "gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100301102921.3215.qmail@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset=us-ascii; 	format=flowed; 	delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7E18)
Subject: Re: [Bug tree-optimization/43213] [4.5 Regression] Worse code generated with -O2
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:38:00 -0000
Cc: "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2



Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:29 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org 
 > wrote:

>
>
> ------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-01  
> 10:29 -------
> Huh.  Confirmed.

Not that interesting because the aliasing sets are different and we  
made 4.5 work for c++ code dealing with dynamic types.


>
>
> -- 
>
> rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> --- 
> --- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
>   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-03-01 10:29:21
>               date|                            |
>   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43213
>