From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-68219-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13576 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2003 09:23:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13322 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2003 09:23:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gate.algorithm.aelita.com) (212.176.18.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 09:23:00 -0000
Received: from bagman.edm.com ([10.0.0.4]) by gate.algorithm.aelita.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35)
          with ESMTP id com; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 13:23:05 +0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Is this a bug?
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 09:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <3F6F4712B759A34ABD453A8B39C10D62DEE73B@bagman.edm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
From: "Lev Assinovsky" <LAssinovsky@algorithm.aelita.com>
To: "Alexandre Oliva" <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: "Gcc-Bugs (E-mail)" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Gcc-Help (E-mail)" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg02276.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

The test case passed under gcc 3.3.1.
The problem was in lack of SOM weak support in gcc prior 3.3

----
Lev Assinovsky
Aelita Software Corporation
O&S Core Division, Programmer
ICQ# 165072909


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexandre Oliva [mailto:aoliva@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:57 PM
> To: Lev Assinovsky
> Cc: Gcc-Bugs (E-mail); Gcc-Help (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
>=20
>=20
> On Aug 12, 2003, "Lev Assinovsky"=20
> <LAssinovsky@algorithm.aelita.com> wrote:
>=20
> > gcc 3.2.3, HPUX-11.00:
>=20
> > t.cpp: In static member function `static const item* A::f()':
> > t.cpp:6: warning: sorry: semantics of inline function=20
> static data `const item=20
> >    arr[1]' are wrong (you'll wind up with multiple copies)
> > t.cpp:6: warning:   you can work around this by removing=20
> the initializer
>=20
> It's not as much of a bug, but rather a limitation AFAIK imposed by
> the object file of the platform you've chosen.  GCC requires weak
> symbols in order to implement this feature correctly, and 32-bit HP-UX
> object files don't support them (completely?).
>=20
> --=20
> Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
> Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
> CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
> Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer
>=20