From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-48489-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12909 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 21:42:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12845 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 21:42:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com) (171.71.163.11)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 21:42:42 -0000
Received: from toque.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@toque.cisco.com [161.44.201.11])
	by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h02LgNFt027772;
	Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:42:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from songtao-w2k01.cisco.com (dhcp-kta1-161-44-193-165.cisco.com [161.44.193.165])
	by toque.cisco.com (Mirapoint)
	with ESMTP id ADM04748;
	Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:33:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030102163940.02192b80@toque.cisco.com>
X-Sender: songtao@toque.cisco.com
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:42:00 -0000
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
From: Songtao Chen <songtao@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030102212330.GA13686@daikokuya.co.uk>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com>
 <4.3.2.7.2.20030102162123.020738d8@toque.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

Hi Neil,

Thanks for replying.

Can you tell me why the parentheses are irrelevant,
any doc to support that?

Songtao

At 09:23 PM 1/2/2003 +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
>Songtao Chen wrote:-
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > It appears to be a bug to me.
>
>No, i++ returns the value before increment.  Parentheses are irrelevant.
>
>Neil.