From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26830 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2008 10:25:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26808 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2008 10:25:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.198.240) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:24:44 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so1822516rvf.56 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.46.10 with SMTP id y10mr3166347waj.137.1218450281958; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.127? ( [76.251.10.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y11sm7476074pod.5.2008.08.11.03.24.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:24:41 -0700 (PDT) References: <20080811094351.25557.qmail@sourceware.org> Message-Id: <5EF6C4E3-370D-4481-8412-6E275262685A@gmail.com> From: Andrew Thomas Pinski To: "gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org" In-Reply-To: <20080811094351.25557.qmail@sourceware.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5B108) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5B108) Subject: Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/36998] [4.3/4.4 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on i586-*-* Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:25:00 -0000 Cc: "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00820.txt.bz2 Sent from my iPhone On Aug 11, 2008, at 2:43, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" wrote: > > > ------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-11 > 09:43 ------- > With building the lirc kernel module I am also able to trogger > > /usr/src/packages/BUILD/lirc-0.8.3/obj/default/lirc_atiusb// > lirc_atiusb.c:433: > internal compiler error: in compute_barrier_args_size, at > dwarf2out.c:1239 > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. > > which is slightly different. No testcase yet as the package seems > to be > broken in different ways anyway (seems to be the same kind of assert > though). There is a pr about this failure already. It happens because of combing noreturn calls. -- Pinski > > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36998 >