Re: [Bug translation/42458] 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file

[Jorma Karvonen <karvonen.jorma@gmail.com>]

OK,

thank you, I was thinking that that %' was wrong. It tried to find
information about %' or gcc-internal-format with google, but missed.
So these all 33 typos are not typos. My mistake. Sorry. PLS, mark this
bug fixed.

Jorma K.

2009/12/22 joseph at codesourcery dot com <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>:
>
>
> ------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2009-12-22 12:15 -------
> Subject: Re:   New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot
>  file
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com wrote:
>
>> I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot:
>
> This is not a useful bug report.  You have extracted some lines, but
> without any explanation of why you think something is wrong with most of
> them.  If you think different things are wrong with different messages,
> each such problem should have its own issue filed as messages in different
> parts of the compiler are maintained by different people.  So file
> separate issues for each distinct problem in a distinct part of the
> compiler, making clear exactly why you think something is wrong.  If you
> think there is a typo, indicate what word you think is wrong and what you
> think it should be instead.
>
>> #: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145
>> #, gcc-internal-format
>> msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition"
>>
>> #: c-decl.c:1533
>> #, gcc-internal-format
>> msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter name
>> list declaration"
>>
>> Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this below, but
>> I do not mark them any more.
>
> What makes you think gcc-internal-format is wrong here?  Both %' and %qE
> are GCC-specific formats (the former indicating that English messages
> should use an apostrophe if LC_CTYPE supports it - so it should not be
> used in translations, only in English messages - and the latter indicating
> that the format argument is an identifier and the output is quoted - so
> %qE should appear in the translations).
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42458
>
>