From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17029 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2009 13:49:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 17016 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2009 13:49:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f211.google.com) (209.85.218.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:49:36 +0000 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so4364396bwz.16 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:49:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.11.19 with SMTP id r19mr183325bkr.205.1261489773247; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:49:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091222121536.19646.qmail@sourceware.org> References: <20091222121536.19646.qmail@sourceware.org> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <79829cc60912220549k63b752bbx40f2c739eda1e98b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Bug translation/42458] 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot file From: Jorma Karvonen To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg02104.txt.bz2 OK, thank you, I was thinking that that %' was wrong. It tried to find information about %' or gcc-internal-format with google, but missed. So these all 33 typos are not typos. My mistake. Sorry. PLS, mark this bug fixed. Jorma K. 2009/12/22 joseph at codesourcery dot com : > > > ------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com =A02009-12-22 12:1= 5 ------- > Subject: Re: =A0 New: 33 typos in gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot > =A0file > > On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, karvonen dot jorma at gmail dot com wrote: > >> I have picked the following lines from file gcc-4.5-b20091203.pot: > > This is not a useful bug report. =A0You have extracted some lines, but > without any explanation of why you think something is wrong with most of > them. =A0If you think different things are wrong with different messages, > each such problem should have its own issue filed as messages in different > parts of the compiler are maintained by different people. =A0So file > separate issues for each distinct problem in a distinct part of the > compiler, making clear exactly why you think something is wrong. =A0If you > think there is a typo, indicate what word you think is wrong and what you > think it should be instead. > >> #: c-common.c:7053 c-common.c:7145 >> #, gcc-internal-format >> msgid "can%'t set %qE attribute after definition" >> >> #: c-decl.c:1533 >> #, gcc-internal-format >> msgid "a parameter list with an ellipsis can%'t match an empty parameter= name >> list declaration" >> >> Is this above really gcc-internal-format ? There are more like this belo= w, but >> I do not mark them any more. > > What makes you think gcc-internal-format is wrong here? =A0Both %' and %qE > are GCC-specific formats (the former indicating that English messages > should use an apostrophe if LC_CTYPE supports it - so it should not be > used in translations, only in English messages - and the latter indicating > that the format argument is an identifier and the output is quoted - so > %qE should appear in the translations). > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D42458 > >