From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk1-xa31.google.com (mail-vk1-xa31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a31]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC2E3858D28 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:51:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6FC2E3858D28 Received: by mail-vk1-xa31.google.com with SMTP id y192so6042881vkc.8 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:51:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WqRZUmBf+V3BXH5tgl1Fv984WmIxflcYG9eaoTEPT0g=; b=YR9mwCAxjFfV5liwFhqiAUvJWdRRORkwWkl6MseJ8MI0LiWDt8Meev9MhnYtE5KoGH 5HzexK9uWjB8xRgdJfuaMXoPFsHl2GxgQu0LTHubWYCJqagAA7W3nu3AndTSoK27tB3R AMbrsMB8OIibsbzcvgwZ19v5p64Q31/G30IZ0r+rL47ArkIhCMQKWYwh2e0XUlgOmS6Y LtWWYVtSTCmAS+d87OObjAP+Xw23uZP5ygctvFOXNoT/r8tgSOfxOpDI3wj5wwUuKDo8 vBtaWk3wg+50c9iKRivhKErFI1+j/prZJd80Y5A2zCHEGJHO0UNhstaHtqnROXmWrSqR pbEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53294lAf8uqMLuvxb4tyD13ptQZFyBH0i6MZwwAtqnA5K5Os0+KJ maS9IHDj/WLxQFdtmuStjwWIrQvW2UN51ZJW+lg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSlitcYsfP+ttH179mFYTRDY2iOApyCOUnxwy2Iv3ACWNYso9lJO4knBPPGKF7lAUNXDL3Eu9SU+CCqav9Oio= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:914f:: with SMTP id t76mr6163847vkd.17.1643496660948; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:51:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Andrew Pinski Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 14:50:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug regression/103997] [12 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr88531-??.c scan-assembler-times FAILs To: write2mark1@gmail.com Cc: GCC Bugs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 22:51:02 -0000 On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 2:40 PM write2mark1--- via Gcc-bugs wrote: > > Why does gcc use CVS and not git GCC has used git for ~2 years now and before that it was using svn for ~14 years; before that used cvs for ~8 years and then used rcs (though the overlap between rcs and cvs is real). GCC's git repo has the history all the way back to the rcs days even. GCC's web pages are in git too; moved to git before the source base and before that it was in cvs (the reasons to move to svn were not needed due to no branch usage, etc.). So I am not understanding the question here really. Thanks, Andrew Pinski > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 5:27 PM admin at levyhsu dot com via Gcc-bugs < > gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103997 > > > > --- Comment #14 from Levy Hsu --- > > Hi Avieira and Richard > > > > I checked the data for the last half month and you are right, that no real > > regression was caused. Thank you all for the detailed explanation.