From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A2A63982437 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:19:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1A2A63982437 Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id i68so3454136qke.3 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 02:19:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4haFOAd5PeVRuQ0ShNgnaGykfF6+u4tefHvjOIPnljc=; b=DYeZv44hnMnYosg/A1fZ+XqySPVwldZyBFy6+LkWhJVKwpdkxHvH9uHfeFf1wMWCLU 529+C8dIX718lea9cXLrkhlTS57UHvLyjvZhmJ3+W+wveyG7yHF+rmyHiiyymhXhyNww ZonkiOBDxo/nOfsbs5YjGkwBbRGLOOvd14sTD60MHNJSgUp2cVEdjWCW1wlqKZqLZo3z I/euwsixhoqvPFY7W9+LQjG8MMaelO18kAD6rzpodq+a0RTyVZYLF0N++IAkMVpU6/pi UrH+yBNqdp9M9m12jnAUfsk3qgMCRpah/7Y+kx87dzYLXN2Wy6mLt7AMHNkq5v++Tzfp Li3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532i7Qna0G50XbCNHDVVfUGgU0uPLWnzuNG3pcx6xVU9tFyes1Lp IFIJOxGg5EM11R9quTOaK4qDAp6en20HIx1iZJY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8IwigLLmMzFP/tNHV5qEjSsXwFUnl9OQ8HXfxtjXQhAeOpd/y8olvJRfmTM+JHRZIUoKbrEyROH38NReII2A= X-Received: by 2002:a25:888e:: with SMTP id d14mr10421331ybl.443.1624439952400; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 02:19:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1da31b4b-a0c7-ecca-0910-b152b0ec79a9@iis.ee.ethz.ch> In-Reply-To: <1da31b4b-a0c7-ecca-0910-b152b0ec79a9@iis.ee.ethz.ch> From: Kito Cheng Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:19:01 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RISC-V: Parsing custom extension that is version 0 To: Robert Balas Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:19:14 -0000 Hi Robert: My assumption is the version should never be 0.0, at least 0.1, so it is treated as 2p0, but I didn't check if the input is really 0p0 or 0, that's kind of bug we need to fix. And I am not familiar with PULP stuff, does it mean PULP really uses version 0.0, and intend to implement multiple-version of that on GCC? On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:07 AM Robert Balas via Gcc-bugs wrote: > > When giving gcc a -march string with a custom extension of > version 0 (for example pulpv0) then gcc will think assign in the > default version of 2p0. > > In gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.c the function > riscv_subset_list::parsing_subset_version falls back to the > default version (2p0) when parsing if the major and minor version > are both zero (which is the case for the string "pulpv0"). This > means both "pulpv0" and "pulpv2" will get assigned the version > 2p0. Looks wrong to me. > > Robert