From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BB073858D37 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:09:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4BB073858D37 Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id e18so5718389ilr.7 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:09:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=sG4K3b6mu8cGwcGDynhFM4H5sOB5Ne94b2DmDG3lXDE=; b=KxduzA88t8xbMsLZkRyeBPGHmELpXl9ZDH5fbxwBVO/OdKcBXoS31J6mZtvVaiZlj1 9VCmNLxtB2GAl4xVpaZi3HNcnn8DINWLhdEH/e6/LAYZdakKYNJ4wFjXeWr9662vBjV9 ykUSzTVUNlegErzCltyjktw7jbpM01PRwY6rx0AFeWxxajxb58WQv/47McxAQXuX5Bak ZN/KcxO+L+7g6jszzQQS22DPuFMSwVRlhzg/E+bTKZB/xQpFRnsPSIePip+2k+wMtbxV 7Mmb1szjjjanyA37OKyUyq2Q9FCgL9G0MdYhXD4+FpG9pIBF2aYDPdyOTQroRrbr+P0c uOag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Hib9lviT1aLD3ZAUaHEMf/G7bP+463fx2bx+OnAoIg6l+xNEM Km/nAlMAHE5K9P8S/Gqg9CI6YanLWCKOSmKzDklrVvzQZSA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybi7aC9ZNreyM2+VtGz8R3gKF3Q92OKMzAhupQcu7i8yHYca4OnURMF8cgyUhJ7vDymDnT65NAvtfaNz0LyVM= X-Received: by 2002:a92:b6d4:: with SMTP id m81mr645681ill.72.1593486580471; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 20:09:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Haoxin Tu Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:09:04 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How GCC treats ice-on-invalid-code? To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:09:42 -0000 I am sorry maybe I send this in a wrong place, I have sent this again in gcc-bug-request@gcc.gun.org. Haoxin Tu =E4=BA=8E2020=E5=B9=B46=E6=9C=8830=E6=97=A5= =E5=91=A8=E4=BA=8C =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=8810:32=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Hi, there, > > Our team just develop a c++ code generator tool to testing the compiler, > and those days I have reported 13 ICE bugs in ice-on-invalid-bugs. > > Here are the bugs links: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95972 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95956 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95955 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95954 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95925 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95930 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95931 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95927 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95932 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95935 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95945 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95938 > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95937 > > Until now, only the last two cases are confirmed. So I am wondering that > how GCC treats with those cases in ice-on-invalid-code? I mean, our team = is > focusing on improving the quality of the mature productive compilers. If > those bugs are useless for GCC, maybe I should stop reporting similar > issues. > > Waiting for your reply. Thank you very much! > > > Best regrades, > Haoxin >