From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <haoxintu@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 985E63858D37
 for <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:32:55 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 985E63858D37
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id a11so8086764ilk.0
 for <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=Z45RtgIyK6YDobiAaG7rM4RPu+qrFHTrHz277chK46E=;
 b=iAHJQLqnvTpU5nNzmKH8IkTHz026LNxbuELMFZrjByUyJtkl79jFvwHFvh8gb8Mhsw
 5sRt6jL673JINqh7YxnKWc6gUbIoSFJhD4lVOpSiw50kfrALKoYu37RFSfZmvculxrHX
 lmduQMOBp2vcL4W7pZ0XUlETVYBjAbEuj6vPgByKUkQGinAXWts9p3HCYNoPQoFvjnxD
 l+VAfzCOw7quZtzWm0vp7J122F689ZXmh6qEmopVcTGUabl8iBzhHs+kZ+lvshpVA1xd
 LVszWWtoVSP8iu73KySnRPyKMF0Y5atc4zdOlh1ROnCDM/TWLqvNysY+IwTmNSxvE7MT
 Hgtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xi50uT177Dlg+ULcNANVLuH/q60g4BwYmaSMkg0bT0xg4uAsA
 QPNIy8j9235iBWHAErlayIAghmN5L/Nls1F5YBKNU07OkhvE7Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6Y3bnBqmgNvkH2wIA61AlXzGeqNMRl3vAY6rXd2wgKW7CEMmNw87jMeuZMbDu6DVyRjPpR291T3glWvrzIoc=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:bb91:: with SMTP id x17mr493909ilk.156.1593484374701; 
 Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Haoxin Tu <haoxintu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 10:32:18 +0800
Message-ID: <CALDyosbeDaiRKTzDbk4wsnbmLd3trWmZeZcSjE_dOn+xjmUn6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: How GCC treats ice-on-invalid-code?
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
 KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 02:32:57 -0000

Hi, there,

Our team just develop a c++ code generator tool to testing the compiler,
and those days I have reported 13 ICE bugs in ice-on-invalid-bugs.

Here are the bugs links:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95972
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95956
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95955
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95954
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95925
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95930
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95931
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95927
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95932
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95935
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95945
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95938
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95937

Until now, only the last two cases are confirmed. So I am wondering that
how GCC treats with those cases in ice-on-invalid-code? I mean, our team is
focusing on improving the quality of the mature productive compilers. If
those bugs are useless for GCC, maybe I should stop reporting similar
issues.

Waiting for your reply. Thank you very much!


Best regrades,
Haoxin