From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5412 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2004 21:20:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5402 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 21:20:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.fuse.net) (216.68.8.171) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 21:20:15 -0000 Received: from dellpi.pinski.fam ([66.42.149.169]) by smtp1.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.00.05.02 201-2115-109-103-20031105) with ESMTP id <20040117212014.LYTP20957.smtp1.fuse.net@dellpi.pinski.fam>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:20:14 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (IDENT:pinskia@localhost.pinski.fam [127.0.0.1]) by dellpi.pinski.fam (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0HLK6LI007170; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:20:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: <20040117112758.13717.d.binderman@virgin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew Pinski , Zack Weinberg From: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: [Bug c++/13717] New: duplicated parameter name not caught ? Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:20:00 -0000 To: "Joseph S. Myers" X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg02011.txt.bz2 List-Id: On Jan 17, 2004, at 04:17, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > now give a diagnostic for C. I guess Zack's patches are the most > likely > cause, or at least the subsequent ones the most likely fix. It was the most recent patch which broke this as it failed still on 2004-01-01. > (Sent to gcc-bugs rather than gcc-bugzilla because this is a separate > bug. > Shall I open a new PR for this regression or will this be fixed shortly > (with the above testcases included) in a subsequent stage of the > c-decl.c > cleanup patches?) I would open just to make sure that it gets fixed. Thanks, Andrew Pinski