From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29797 invoked by alias); 26 May 2003 02:10:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29713 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 02:10:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (69.3.5.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 May 2003 02:10:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO dberlin.org) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b6) with ESMTP-TLS id 4063684; Sun, 25 May 2003 22:10:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 02:43:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: pinskia@physics.uc.edu cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug ada/9953] [3.4 regression] Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (code) In-Reply-To: <20030526014723.14941.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20030526014723.14941.qmail@sources.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02745.txt.bz2 List-Id: Please target 3.4 regressions at milestone 3.4, so people don't have to do summary searches to try to determine what should be fixed for 3.4 I'm not sure it's actually necessary to mark it as a 3.4 regression in the summary, as we could use a bug flag for regression rather than dirtying the summary. > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED > Resolution|FIXED | > Summary|Unsatisfied symbols: |[3.4 regression] Unsatisfied > |U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind |symbols: > |(code) |U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind > | |(code) > > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-05-26 01:47 ------- > According to the submitter it is broken for 3.4, but was fixed for 3.2.3 and 3.4. > > > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. >