From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18671 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2005 01:01:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18637 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2005 01:01:18 -0000 Received: from h-68-164-203-246.nycmny83.covad.net (HELO dberlin.org) (68.164.203.246) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 01:01:18 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO localhost.localdomain) by dberlin.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTPS id 8186636; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:01:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 01:01:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: ben at decadentplace dot org dot uk cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug libgcj/24170] [SECURITY] readdir_r considered harmful In-Reply-To: <20051002231612.30274.qmail@sourceware.org> Message-ID: References: <20051002231612.30274.qmail@sourceware.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 List-Id: On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, ben at decadentplace dot org dot uk wrote: > > > ------- Comment #1 from ben at decadentplace dot org dot uk 2005-10-02 23:16 ------- > Can someone please remove this from public view, as Mozilla does for security > bugs on their Bugzilla? Unlike mozilla, we do not remove security bugs from public view. Nobody has ever set a policy for gcc that says we should (IE taking position on the merits of whether we should have such a policy, we don't).