public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, LpSolit@netscape.net
Subject: Re: [Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1109291536460.26375@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-39813-4-jpLBGOfpXd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813
> 
> Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
>                    |                            |com

Paolo, you appear to have removed gcc-bugs from the CC list of several 
bugs.  I don't know how you did it - our Bugzilla is supposed to prevent 
accidental removal of gcc-bugs, all bugs in the gcc product should always 
have gcc-bugs in their CC lists - but please add it back to the bugs from 
which you removed it.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-29 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-39813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-09-29  0:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-29 15:46   ` Joseph S. Myers [this message]
2011-09-29 15:48     ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-09-29 15:48 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-09-29 15:48 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-29 15:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-09-29 15:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-29 16:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2011-09-29 17:03 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-09-29 17:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-18 18:58 ` [Bug c++/39813] improve __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for templated methos lundberj at gmail dot com
2015-04-27 22:27 ` [Bug c++/39813] improve __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for templated methods paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2009-04-19 11:27 [Bug c++/39813] New: [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition gcc at daryl dot haresign dot com
2009-12-29 14:55 ` [Bug c++/39813] " gcc at daryl dot haresign dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1109291536460.26375@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=LpSolit@netscape.net \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).