From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4C01A393BA5A; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 20:12:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4C01A393BA5A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663359129;
	bh=7ZAyuWyziltxLRVg/iFcN/eEH+zsQPGUQSuQY7j5tkM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lOR+lbUmSfKvUXg0XYWFuR26ZdexZM0vSUtbajcsKkKliMLa9hrJgTiKIc3zOncAB
	 erM+ux3EFGvLYobIlzJPqTPe/UBXZdqbLWIDIGu4LfSfT/L+4BcZbgRG/TEQMIXXJn
	 2fp8kjHNwZG/L5bLohCojNqi5sYdWVrfvsUEHm4o=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/100024] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE on subroutine
 missing explicit interface
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 20:12:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status cc
Message-ID: <bug-100024-4-2nUz3GHT4O@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100024-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100024

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The basic issue seems to have been fixed by the patch for PR103287,
and the present patch would collide with that one.

Marking as fixed & duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103287 ***=