From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 523413898516; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:22:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 523413898516
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/100041] ICE in curr_insn_transform, at
 lra-constraints.c:4022
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:22:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-100041-4-6RVqQcLtrg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100041-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100041-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:22:05 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100041

Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|11.0                        |12.0

--- Comment #20 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19)
> I'm worried that there isn't enough time to find out before GCC11 release=
 if
> some packages in the wild aren't using that option.
> E.g. I wonder where it comes from in this PR.  Clearly it doesn't come fr=
om
> gcc, so does it come from LLVM makefiles or has the reporter just added i=
t?

OK, let's wait with the patch after the branch, and leave things as they are
for now.

BTW: I don't think the fix for PR79514 is enough to handle any non-trivial
usage of -m96bit-long-double, and this PR reflects the fact.=