public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/100053] [9 Regression] tree-fre incorrectly delete a condition
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 13:54:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100053-4-08doY9vXpE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100053-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100053

--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
<rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f2a65357f7b122a4e2b78b235d6faaa3d7ab3a4

commit r9-9509-g6f2a65357f7b122a4e2b78b235d6faaa3d7ab3a4
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date:   Tue Apr 13 12:05:53 2021 +0200

    tree-optimization/100053 - fix predication in VN

    This avoids doing optimistic dominance queries involving
    non-executable backedges when validating recorded predicated values
    in VN because we have no way to force re-evaluating validity when
    optimistically not executable edges become executable later.

    2021-04-13  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

            PR tree-optimization/100053
            * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value): Do
            not use optimistic dominance queries for backedges to validate
            predicated values.
            (dominated_by_p_w_unex): Add parameter to ignore executable
            state on backedges.
            (rpo_elim::eliminate_avail): Adjust.

            * gcc.dg/torture/pr100053.c: New testcase.
            * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-93.c: Likewise.

    (cherry picked from commit f9810422f6768b914aabfcbffe64f535bdd18452)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-12 21:17 [Bug tree-optimization/100053] New: " qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-12 22:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100053] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13  8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13  9:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 10:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 10:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100053] [9/10/11 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 11:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 12:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 12:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100053] [9/10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 15:28 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-13 16:32 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-04-13 23:55 ` qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-26 11:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 13:54 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-05-04 13:55 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100053] [9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100053-4-08doY9vXpE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).