From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 54C30393D03B; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:50:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 54C30393D03B
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/100057] There are no freestanding C++
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:50:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-100057-4-Oo2vv3iNHs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100057-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100057-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:50:11 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100057

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #26)
> yes. i tried that first and Then report a bug here. whats wrong with it?
> wasn't bugzilla designed for the stuff here? you asked me not to put you =
in
> the CC list and i did. Whats the complain here?

That "There is no freestanding in C++" and "I'm perfectly correct" are not =
bug
reports, and "It is such a joke." doesn't persuade anybody to try and help =
you.


>=20
> 1. i do build things with newlib and i know It works. However It was
> actually you who said newlib is not standard compliant etc.

In what context?

I might have said some part of newlib is not conforming, but that's true for
most software.



> 2. i am not the first person who tried that. i believe a lot of people tr=
ied
> that before and they failed. That is why newlib is very popular. However =
It
> still does not change the fact using C++ to write OS kernel stuffs are
> fruastrating.

Sure. But "it's frustrating" is too vague to do anything about.

If you want to make it less frustrating, report specific, detailed bug repo=
rts.
"It is such a joke" is not helpful and gets your bugs closed.


> 4. When people build stuffs with newlib they usually do not disable
> libstdcxx verbose which leads to at least 60kb of Binary bloat of binutils
> (c++filt)+the dependency of stdio which make exception handling much hard=
 to
> use

It's not a gcc bug if people don't use the existing options that would help
them.



(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #27)
> How to commit code to gcc? what's the permission requirement?


https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html=