From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3B9E8395C82F; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:00:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3B9E8395C82F From: "munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/100085] Bad code for union transfer from __float128 to vector types Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:00:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:00:51 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100085 --- Comment #13 from Steven Munroe --- "We want to use plain TImode instead of V1TImode on newer cpus." Actually I disagree. We have vector __int128 in the ABI and with POWER10 a complete set arithmetic operations for 128-bit in VRs. Also this issue is not restricted to TImode. It also effects _Float128 (KFmode), _ibm128 (TFmode) and Libmvec for vector float/double. The proper = and optimum handling of these "union transfers" has been broken in GCC for year= s. And I have grave reservations about the vague plans of small/fringe minorit= y to subset the PowerISA for their convenience.=