From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 69D0C3858D28; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:31:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 69D0C3858D28
From: "munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/100085] Bad code for union transfer from __float128 to
 vector types
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:31:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100085-4-95c7Xbi4GZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100085-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100085-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:31:55 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100085

--- Comment #21 from Steven Munroe <munroesj at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes I was told by Peter Bergner that the fix from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100085#c15 had been back por=
ted
top AT15.0-1.

But when ran this test with AT15.0-1 I saw:

0000000000000000 <test_xfer_bin128_2_vui32t_V0>:
   0:   20 00 20 39     li      r9,32
   4:   d0 ff 41 39     addi    r10,r1,-48
   8:   57 12 42 f0     xxswapd vs34,vs34
   c:   99 4f 4a 7c     stxvd2x vs34,r10,r9
  10:   ce 48 4a 7c     lvx     v2,r10,r9
  14:   20 00 80 4e     blr

0000000000000030 <test_xfer_bin128_2_vui64t_V0>:
  30:   20 00 20 39     li      r9,32
  34:   d0 ff 41 39     addi    r10,r1,-48
  38:   57 12 42 f0     xxswapd vs34,vs34
  3c:   99 4f 4a 7c     stxvd2x vs34,r10,r9
  40:   ce 48 4a 7c     lvx     v2,r10,r9
  44:   20 00 80 4e     blr

0000000000000060 <test_xfer_bin128_2_vui128t_V0>:
  60:   20 00 20 39     li      r9,32
  64:   d0 ff 41 39     addi    r10,r1,-48
  68:   57 12 42 f0     xxswapd vs34,vs34
  6c:   99 4f 4a 7c     stxvd2x vs34,r10,r9
  70:   99 4e 4a 7c     lxvd2x  vs34,r10,r9
  74:   57 12 42 f0     xxswapd vs34,vs34
  78:   20 00 80 4e     blr

0000000000000090 <test_xfer_bin128_2_ui128t_V0>:
  90:   57 12 42 f0     xxswapd vs34,vs34
  94:   20 00 40 39     li      r10,32
  98:   d0 ff 01 39     addi    r8,r1,-48
  9c:   f0 ff 21 39     addi    r9,r1,-16
  a0:   99 57 48 7c     stxvd2x vs34,r8,r10
  a4:   00 00 69 e8     ld      r3,0(r9)
  a8:   08 00 89 e8     ld      r4,8(r9)
  ac:   20 00 80 4e     blr

So either the patch for AT15.0-1 is not applied correctly or is non-functio=
nal
because of some difference between GCC11/GCC12. Or regressed because of some
other change/patch.

In my experience this part of GCC is fragile (based on the long/sad history=
 of
IBM long double). So this needs to monitored with each new update.=