public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/100124] Why is "flexible array member '...' in an otherwise empty '...'" an issue?
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 21:13:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100124-4-ySc89XtUAd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100124-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100124

Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |69698

--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
G++ accepted structs where a flexible array is the sole member until version 6.
 G++ 6 tightened up the rules (in r231665) to more closely match the C front
end.  I suspect Clang implemented the more permissive historical G++ behavior
in C++ mode for compatibility with G++ and the stricter GCC behavior in C mode,
and to this day hasn't changed.  My impression is that the historical G++
permissiveness was due to oversights rather than deliberate features (we're
tracking a few such outstanding issues in pr69698 that are yet to be fixed).


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69698
[Bug 69698] [meta-bug] flexible array members

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-17 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 20:18 [Bug c/100124] New: " gcc at behdad dot org
2021-04-16 20:50 ` [Bug c++/100124] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-16 21:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-17  0:03 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-17  0:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-17 21:13 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-04-20 19:32 ` gcc at behdad dot org
2021-04-20 20:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-20 22:16 ` gcc at behdad dot org
2021-04-26 22:26 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100124-4-ySc89XtUAd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).