From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0859D3838005; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:49:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0859D3838005 From: "gonzalobg88 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/100185] New: transparent_union fails when the union has a destructor Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:49:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gonzalobg88 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:49:26 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100185 Bug ID: 100185 Summary: transparent_union fails when the union has a destructor Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: gonzalobg88 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Example: union __attribute__((transparent_union)) U { int* a; ~U() {} }; fails with: :1:43: error: type transparent 'union U' cannot be made transpa= rent=20 because the type of the first field has a different ABI from the class overall 1 | union __attribute__((transparent_union)) U { | ^ I think this should be allowed with the following semantics: void f(int*); void g(U&); void h(U); void j(int); { U u; f(u); // passes U as int* g(u); // passes U as U& h(u); // ERROR: U does not have a copy constructor j(u); // ERROR: cannot convert U to int //~U() called at the end of the scope }=