From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B9AAC38930D7; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:33:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B9AAC38930D7 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/100186] lto-wrapper.c assumes std::thread Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:33:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 18:33:03 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100186 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Martin Li=C5=A1ka from comment #7) > > The fact that something is in C++11 doesn't mean we can assume it in GC= C, > > while GCC 4.8.x which we still want to support had roughly complete C++= 11 FE > > support, I think the libstdc++ side wasn't there yet. >=20 > Do we really support it? https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html > mentions that an 'ISO C++11 compiler' is required. Yes, we do, support back to 4.8.x was part of the switch to C++11 language decision.=