From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B635C3844044; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:31:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B635C3844044
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/100209] multiple inheritance with crtp pattern fails on
 sequentioal member access
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:31:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100209-4-bjL3GKBAPi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100209-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100209-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 21:31:33 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100209

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0120cd9382728fdc99d4cfdcb72cd0f55aca2ce3

commit r12-136-g0120cd9382728fdc99d4cfdcb72cd0f55aca2ce3
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 26 17:30:39 2021 -0400

    c++: constexpr pointer indirection with negative offset [PR100209]

    During constexpr evaluation, a base-to-derived conversion may yield an
    expression like (Derived*)(&D.2217.D.2106 p+ -4) where D.2217 is the
    derived object and D.2106 is the base.  But cxx_fold_indirect_ref
    doesn't know how to resolve an INDIRECT_REF thereof to just D.2217,
    because it doesn't handle POINTER_PLUS_EXPR of a COMPONENT_REF with
    negative offset well: when the offset N is positive, it knows that
    '&x p+ N' is equivalent to '&x.f p+ (N - bytepos(f))', but it doesn't
    know about the reverse transformation, that '&x.f p+ N' is equivalent
    to '&x p+ (N + bytepos(f))' when N is negative, which is important for
    resolving such base-to-derived conversions and for accessing subobjects
    backwards.  This patch teaches cxx_fold_indirect_ref this reverse
    transformation.

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/100209
            * constexpr.c (cxx_fold_indirect_ref): Try to canonicalize the
            object/offset pair for a POINTER_PLUS_EXPR of a COMPONENT_REF
            with a negative offset into one whose offset is nonnegative
            before calling cxx_fold_indirect_ref_1.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR c++/100209
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-base1.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-ptrsub1.C: New test.=