From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 084C03858C2D; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 23:36:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 084C03858C2D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1662075394; bh=jpBJAXiOmyFvyfal1Z5BsEJgecF0vk4c+5FxNdOV7tM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FZFhWWT0SIHXcLi6hmqCaeLISbKG85Eof7/wqyhlpe6qC3fNc9TbAEfqyubZkXJvi Jy5WIBpgftPH6J4JnH5eessVa8ZrC0C9xrVV59sQgVgDZl5f6JS07SzySIMQcTPX/U M/SHKOd/hTST+pVpL1ZE13j2erU+npH6xCcUFDas= From: "jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/100245] ICE on automatic reallocation Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 23:36:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100245 --- Comment #4 from Jos=C3=A9 Rui Faustino de Sousa --- On 01/09/22 19:30, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100245 >=20 Hi Anlauf, Sorry for the very late answer, but at the moment I am far too busy to=20 even look into it. Do as you see fit, it is fine by me. Best regards, Jos=C3=A9 Rui > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: >=20 > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.o= rg >=20 > --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > Jose, your patch looks fine, but unfortunately was never reviewed. > Do you plan to ping it, or shall I take care of it? >=