public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/100254] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-pta -fnon-call-exceptions
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 12:08:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100254-4-eY19dmbmpY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100254-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100254

--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a79a9043c2c8e07ab3165437a93d54cbbc9890d

commit r10-9793-g5a79a9043c2c8e07ab3165437a93d54cbbc9890d
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 27 15:26:24 2021 +0200

    cfgcleanup: Fix -fcompare-debug issue in outgoing_edges_match [PR100254]

    The following testcase fails with -fcompare-debug.  The problem is that
    outgoing_edges_match behaves differently between -g0 and -g, if
    some load/store with REG_EH_REGION is followed by DEBUG_INSNs, the
    REG_EH_REGION check is not done, while when there are no DEBUG_INSNs, it is
    done.

    We already compute last1 and last2 as BB_END (bb{1,2}) with skipped debug
    insns and notes, so this patch just uses those.

    2021-04-27  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR rtl-optimization/100254
            * cfgcleanup.c (outgoing_edges_match): Check REG_EH_REGION on
            last1 and last2 insns rather than BB_END (bb1) and BB_END (bb2)
insns.

            * g++.dg/opt/pr100254.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit e600df51a15b2ec7a72731921a2464ffe59cf5ab)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-25 19:21 [Bug debug/100254] New: " zsojka at seznam dot cz
2021-04-26  7:30 ` [Bug debug/100254] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-26  8:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-26  9:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-26 10:42 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/100254] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 13:27 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 13:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-27 13:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 12:08 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-05-04 12:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 12:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100254-4-eY19dmbmpY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).