public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "stefansf at linux dot ibm.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/100263] [11/12 Regression] RTL optimizers miscompile loop Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:52:06 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-100263-4-roMZdZFzQD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-100263-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263 --- Comment #9 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefansf at linux dot ibm.com> --- Shouldn't we rather check for REG_CAN_CHANGE_MODE_P? A check for TARGET_HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK for a FP register and QImode is successful. Using the following also fixes the test for me: diff --git a/gcc/postreload.c b/gcc/postreload.c index dc67643384d..3dccbe63cf4 100644 --- a/gcc/postreload.c +++ b/gcc/postreload.c @@ -1733,7 +1733,7 @@ move2add_valid_value_p (int regno, scalar_int_mode mode) regno of the lowpart might be different. */ poly_int64 s_off = subreg_lowpart_offset (mode, old_mode); s_off = subreg_regno_offset (regno, old_mode, s_off, mode); - if (maybe_ne (s_off, 0)) + if (maybe_ne (s_off, 0) || !REG_CAN_CHANGE_MODE_P (regno, old_mode, mode)) /* We could in principle adjust regno, check reg_mode[regno] to be BLKmode, and return s_off to the caller (vs. -1 for failure), but we currently have no callers that could make use of this
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 11:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-26 10:49 [Bug tree-optimization/100263] New: Wrong removal of statement in copyprop3 stefansf at linux dot ibm.com 2021-04-26 14:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100263] [11/12 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-26 15:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-26 16:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-27 5:56 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/100263] [11/12 Regression] RTL optimizers miscompile loop stefansf at linux dot ibm.com 2021-04-27 10:27 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com 2021-04-28 8:43 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com 2021-04-28 10:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-28 10:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-28 11:52 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com [this message] 2021-04-28 12:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-28 14:20 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com 2021-05-05 15:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 15:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 15:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 15:11 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 15:13 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-06 12:51 ` stefansf at linux dot ibm.com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-100263-4-roMZdZFzQD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).