From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1E098384B070; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:29:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1E098384B070 From: "christophm30 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/100264] New: REE does not work on PARALLEL expressions with a single register SET child Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:29:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: christophm30 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 11:29:43 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100264 Bug ID: 100264 Summary: REE does not work on PARALLEL expressions with a single register SET child Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: christophm30 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- REE iterates over all SET expressions and tries to eliminate redundant zero-extensions. In case of a PARALLEL expression, there is a check in plac= e to ensure that "only one child of a PARALLEL expression is a SET". Let's imagine a PARALLEL expression with two register SETs. An example would be store-conditional, which sets a memory location (store target) as well as a register (return success value). The current implementation is not able to optimize a zero-extension of the return value of store-conditional. This can be solved, by moving the check for register targets (i.e. REG_P ()) into the function get_sub_rtx () and change the restriction of REE to "only= one child of a PARALLEL expression is a SET register".=