public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/100291] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: trying to capture ‘this’ in instantiation of generic lambda Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:12:22 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-100291-4-UMhl1GkLTu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-100291-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100291 Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|--- |8.5 Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code Summary|internal compiler error: |[8/9/10/11/12 Regression] |trying to capture ‘this’ in |internal compiler error: |instantiation of generic |trying to capture ‘this’ in |lambda |instantiation of generic | |lambda CC| |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think this is ICE-on-invalid. Started with r245065: /home/mpolacek/w.C:119:57: internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:2969 [&](auto, auto cmp) { SingleStepper::time(cmp.state); }); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ 0x9ac65b finish_member_declaration(tree_node*) ../../gcc/cp/semantics.c:2966 0xa52ce3 add_capture(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*, bool, bool) ../../gcc/cp/lambda.c:600 0xa53090 add_default_capture(tree_node*, tree_node*, tree_node*) ../../gcc/cp/lambda.c:669 0xa538dd lambda_expr_this_capture(tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/cp/lambda.c:760 0xa53ca1 maybe_resolve_dummy(tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/cp/lambda.c:827 0x787891 build_new_method_call_1 ../../gcc/cp/call.c:8760 0x787f30 build_new_method_call(tree_node*, tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, tree_node*, int, tree_node**, int) ../../gcc/cp/call.c:8870 0x83ef22 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool, bool) ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:17279 0x83a881 tsubst_expr(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:16401 0x834e7e tsubst_expr(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:15669 0x8369b0 tsubst_expr(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:15879 0x8369b0 tsubst_expr(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool) ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:15879 0x858968 instantiate_decl(tree_node*, int, bool) ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:22817 0x8c2790 maybe_instantiate_decl ../../gcc/cp/decl2.c:5008 0x8c3060 mark_used(tree_node*, int) ../../gcc/cp/decl2.c:5107 0x784968 build_over_call ../../gcc/cp/call.c:8088 0x77593c build_op_call_1 ../../gcc/cp/call.c:4518 0x775acc build_op_call(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, int) ../../gcc/cp/call.c:4544 0x9aa173 finish_call_expr(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, bool, bool, int) ../../gcc/cp/semantics.c:2458 0x83ef56 tsubst_copy_and_build(tree_node*, tree_node*, int, tree_node*, bool, bool) ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:17286
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-27 17:12 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-04-27 17:06 [Bug c++/100291] New: " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-27 17:12 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-05-14 9:54 ` [Bug c++/100291] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-01 8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:45 ` [Bug c++/100291] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:39 ` [Bug c++/100291] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-25 20:21 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-10-25 20:27 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-100291-4-UMhl1GkLTu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).