From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 736A13858022; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 22:33:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 736A13858022 From: "vgupta at synopsys dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/100363] gcc generating wider load/store than warranted at -O3 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 22:33:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vgupta at synopsys dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 22:33:23 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100363 --- Comment #6 from Vineet Gupta --- (In reply to Linus Torvalds from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > The loop gets vectorized, I don't see the problem really. >=20 >=20 > See >=20 >=20=20=20=20 > https://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain/issues/= 372 >=20 > and in particular the comment >=20 > "In the first 8-byte copy, src and dst overlap" >=20 > so apparently gcc has decided that they can't overlap, despite the two > pointers being literally generated from the same base pointer. Exactly: > But I don't real arc assembly, so I'll have to take Vineet's word for it. fwiw: LDD.a [base, off] is 8-byte load with pre-incr : eff addr =3D base + offset STD.ab [base, off] is 8-byte store with post-incr: eff addr =3D base > Vineet, have you been able to generate a smaller test-case? No I'm afraid not.=