public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/100363] gcc generating wider load/store than warranted at -O3
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:43:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100363-4-am3ILl01og@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100363-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-04-30
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The loop gets vectorized, I don't see the problem really.

Also I don't see the preprocessed source.  Can you attach that?

Is the problem that the loads have to be done in 2 bytes always from the
hardware?
If so then you need to mark the pointer as volatile.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-30 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-30 20:09 [Bug c/100363] New: " vgupta at synopsys dot com
2021-04-30 21:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-04-30 21:44 ` [Bug middle-end/100363] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-30 21:56 ` vgupta at synopsys dot com
2021-04-30 22:02 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2021-04-30 22:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100363] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-30 22:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-30 22:33 ` vgupta at synopsys dot com
2021-05-01 22:54 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-01 23:09 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2021-05-03  7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-03 16:03 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2021-05-03 16:18 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2021-05-03 17:25 ` vgupta at synopsys dot com
2021-05-03 17:28 ` vgupta at synopsys dot com
2021-05-03 17:47 ` torvalds@linux-foundation.org
2021-05-03 18:45 ` vgupta at synopsys dot com
2021-05-03 19:43 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04  6:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 19:33 ` vgupta at synopsys dot com
2021-05-05  6:32 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-05-05 19:59 ` ndesaulniers at google dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100363-4-am3ILl01og@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).