From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 8F8BE385800A; Sat,  1 May 2021 19:30:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8F8BE385800A
From: "luc.vanoostenryck at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/100378] New: [Regression 9/10/11/12] arm64:
 lsl + asr used instead of sxth
Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 19:30:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: luc.vanoostenryck at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
 attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-100378-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 19:30:34 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100378

            Bug ID: 100378
           Summary: [Regression 9/10/11/12] arm64: lsl + asr used instead
                    of sxth
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: luc.vanoostenryck at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 50727
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D50727&action=3Dedit
testcase

On arm64, when compiling with optimization, for example with -O2,
the following code:

    struct sh {
        short a;
        short b;
        short y[2];
    };
    int fooh(struct sh s) { return s.a; }

produces the following assembly code since GCC9.x:
    fooh:
        lsl     x0, x0, 16
        asr     w0, w0, 16
        ret

but with GCC8.x and before it produces the shorter:
    fooh(sh):
        sxth    w0, w0
        ret


See https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/YrW7E3cro=