public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgomp/100390] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90   -O  execution test
@ 2021-05-03  6:41 vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-03  6:46 ` [Bug libgomp/100390] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-03  6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390

            Bug ID: 100390
           Summary: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90   -O  execution
                    test
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libgomp
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

I ran into:
...
Execution timeout is: 300
spawn [open ...]^M
STOP 3
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90   -O  execution test
...

Build from commit a13a50047ef "Fortran: Async I/O - avoid unlocked unlocking
[PR100352]".

Configured like so:
...
$ ./build/gcc/xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./build/gcc/xgcc
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/vries/gcc_versions/devel/src/configure
--disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib
--prefix=/home/vries/gcc_versions/devel/install CFLAGS='-O0 -g -Wall'
CXXFLAGS='-O0 -g -Wall'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210502 (experimental) (GCC) 
...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90   -O  execution test
  2021-05-03  6:41 [Bug libgomp/100390] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-03  6:46 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-03  6:54 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-03  6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390

--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fails not very often (twice in a run of 100):
...
$ for n in $(seq 1 100); do make check "RUNTESTFLAGS=fortran.exp=depobj-1.f90"
2>&1 | grep "expected passes"; done            
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90   -O  execution test
  2021-05-03  6:41 [Bug libgomp/100390] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-03  6:46 ` [Bug libgomp/100390] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-03  6:54 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-11 10:10 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-11 11:38 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-03  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390

--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In combination with stress -c 5, I get more FAILs:
...
$ for n in $(seq 1 100); do make check "RUNTESTFLAGS=fortran.exp=depobj-1.f90"
2>&1 | grep "expected passes"; done
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            1
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
# of expected passes            2
...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90   -O  execution test
  2021-05-03  6:41 [Bug libgomp/100390] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-03  6:46 ` [Bug libgomp/100390] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-03  6:54 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-11 10:10 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-11 11:38 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-11 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-05-11
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Tom, are you still seeing that after PR100397 "New test case
libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 fails erratically since its introduction in
r12-20" resolved with commit r12-399-g08fff201c92109b5476a4cc211c71de557ec87b1
"OpenMP/Fortran - fix pasto + testcase in depobj [PR100397]"?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug libgomp/100390] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90   -O  execution test
  2021-05-03  6:41 [Bug libgomp/100390] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test vries at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-05-11 10:10 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-11 11:38 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vries at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-11 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100390

Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #3)
> Tom, are you still seeing that after PR100397 "New test case
> libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 fails erratically since its introduction in
> r12-20" resolved with commit
> r12-399-g08fff201c92109b5476a4cc211c71de557ec87b1 "OpenMP/Fortran - fix
> pasto + testcase in depobj [PR100397]"?

Nope, in conjunction with stress -c 5 100/100 passes.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 100397 ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-11 11:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-03  6:41 [Bug libgomp/100390] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/depobj-1.f90 -O execution test vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-03  6:46 ` [Bug libgomp/100390] " vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-03  6:54 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-11 10:10 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-11 11:38 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).