From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4EB9A3938C32; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:48:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4EB9A3938C32 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/100393] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Very slow compilation of switch statement with thousands of cases Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 13:48:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 13:48:52 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100393 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Samples: 847K of event 'cycles:u', Event count (approx.): 839745061761=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 95.05% 804298 cc1 cc1 [.] tree_switch_conversion::jump_table_cluster::can_be_handled 1.69% 14493 cc1 cc1 [.] tree_switch_conversion::cluster::get_range 0.86% 7291 cc1 cc1 [.] optimize_function_for_size_p looks like there's obvious quadraticness here when doing the summing: bool jump_table_cluster::can_be_handled (const vec &clusters, unsigned start, unsigned end) { .. for (unsigned i =3D start; i <=3D end; i++) { simple_cluster *sc =3D static_cast (clusters[i]); comparison_count +=3D sc->m_range_p ? 2 : 1; } and we're almost trying all possible clusters in jump_table_cluster::find_jump_tables Now, there's the possibility of doing a quick guess before doing this loop, once via using (end - start) and once via using 2 * (end - start). Only if the first can be handled and the second not we have to compute. Martin?=