public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/100405] Add implicit 'return *this;' in assignment operators
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 20:40:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100405-4-fPRqaRB4mh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100405-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100405

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|missing return assignment   |Add implicit 'return
                   |                            |*this;' in assignment
                   |                            |operators
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=85523
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-05-03
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|RESOLVED                    |NEW

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It would be nice if G++ would Do The Right Thing here:

struct T
{
  T& operator=(const T& t)
  {
    i = t.i;
    /* forgot to write return *this; */
  }

  int i = 0;
};

If the user forgets to write 'return *this;' in an assignment operator the
results can be quite unpleasant (after optimization).

Similar to the implicit 'return 0;' in main it would be nice to add an implicit
return *this to assignment operators. It could be done in cases where
-Wreturn-type warns (e.g. there isn't a throw or a call to a noreturn function
before the end of the function) and if the return type is decltype(*this).

G++ does give a -Wreturn-type warning for the example above (and since gcc 9 it
adds a fix-it hint, thanks to PR 85523) but for a template it doesn't warn
until it's instantiated:

template<typename>
struct T
{
  T& operator=(const T& t)
  {
    i = t.i;
    /* forgot to write return *this; */
  }

  int i = 0;
};

This compiles without a warning (which is PR 48586).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-03 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-03 20:27 [Bug c++/100405] New: missing return assignment redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-03 20:28 ` [Bug c++/100405] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-03 20:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-05-03 22:22 ` [Bug c++/100405] Add implicit 'return *this;' in assignment operators redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-03 22:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100405-4-fPRqaRB4mh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).