From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DF9F43858404; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:05:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DF9F43858404 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/100486] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:05:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: charlet at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:05:51 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100486 --- Comment #58 from Eric Botcazou --- So we have the dreaded mix of 11.x Ada exception code and 10.x unwind code: #0 0x773bb68b in msvcrt!abort () from C:\WINDOWS\SysWOW64\msvcrt.dll #1 0x02074f7d in uw_init_context_1 (context=3Dcontext@entry=3D0x1070c890, outer_cfa=3Douter_cfa@entry=3D0x1070ca70, outer_ra=3D0x406f8a <__gnat_Unwind_RaiseException(_Unwind_Exception*)+1= 7>) at ../../../gcc-10.3.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2.c:1593 #2 0x01e2ba3d in _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=3D0x132d8a90) at ../../../gcc-10.3.0/libgcc/unwind.inc:93 #3 0x00406f8a in __gnat_Unwind_RaiseException (e=3De@entry=3D0x132d8a90) at ../../gcc-11.2.0/gcc/ada/raise-gcc.c:1391 On the one hand, this should no longer exist on the mainline but, on the ot= her hand, this has never been problematic for AdaCore's internal builds.=