From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 874F23858003; Sun,  4 Jul 2021 17:15:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 874F23858003
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/100486] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:15:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100486-4-zqjyqaeahT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100486-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:15:11 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100486

--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Other users reported that only DWARF crashes. If the build is configured =
for
> SJLJ or SEH exception models, it completes.
>=20
> A user speculated that the problem might be related to Gcc 11 using DWARF=
 5
> now. If you think that that is plausible and instruct me on how to revert
> that change I'll test the hypothesis.

We do have successful builds (DWARF EH + DWARF 5), that's why I'm trying to
understand what's different in your setup.  Do you really have no other fai=
lure
message than the one output by 'make'?=