From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B8D363858428; Tue,  9 Aug 2022 06:55:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8D363858428
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyBjLzEwMDUyNV0gSUNFOiB0cmVlIGNoZWNrOiBleHBlY3Rl?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ZCBjbGFzcyDigJh0eXBl4oCZLCBoYXZlIOKAmGV4Y2VwdGlvbmFs4oCZIChl?=
 =?UTF-8?B?cnJvcl9tYXJrKSBpbiB1c2VsZXNzX3R5cGVfY29udmVyc2lvbl9wLCBhdCBn?=
 =?UTF-8?B?aW1wbGUtZXhwci5jOjg3?=
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:55:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100525-4-LwPBDV8922@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 06:55:57 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100525

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Btw, the issue for the original testcase is that we run into

static void
c_parser_gimple_statement (gimple_parser &parser, gimple_seq *seq)
{
...
  /* GIMPLE call statement without LHS.  */
  if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_SEMICOLON)
      && TREE_CODE (lhs.value) =3D=3D CALL_EXPR)
    {
      gimple *call;
      call =3D gimple_build_call_from_tree (lhs.value, NULL);
      gimple_seq_add_stmt_without_update (seq, call);
      gimple_set_location (call, loc);
      return;

and the C FE hands us back a non-error CALL_EXPR with an error_mark_node
argument.  Usually those get "cleaned out" during gimplification but here
it prevails.=