From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E4E953894C21; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:43:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E4E953894C21
From: "sumbera at volny dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/100559] build failure of 32-bit Ada runtime after local
 modification
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:43:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sumbera at volny dot cz
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-100559-4-rbxSjPemhY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-100559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-100559-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:43:05 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100559

--- Comment #17 from Petr Sumbera <sumbera at volny dot cz> ---
(In reply to Petr Sumbera from comment #16)
> (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #15)

> > I'd seen that change before in solaris-userland, but never understood
> > the point.  Those directories are only used inside the build trees.
>=20
> Ok. I will see if we can remove it for GCC 11.

I think it was done because of packaging. So that SPARC and Intel would have
more similar paths (in one manifest file). But it can be overcome. I will t=
ry
to avoid the patch file.=