From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9321A3857C52; Thu, 13 May 2021 02:06:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9321A3857C52 From: "hewillk at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/100567] views::take and views::drop should conditionally use _RangeAdaptor::operator() Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 02:06:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hewillk at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 02:06:55 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100567 =E5=BA=B7=E6=A1=93=E7=91=8B changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from =E5=BA=B7=E6=A1=93=E7=91=8B = --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1) > Hmm, I believe we're behaving correctly according to wg21.link/p2281. Th= is > paper clarifies that partial application of a range adaptor stores the ex= tra > arguments in their decayed form, so in particular we discard their > cv-qualifications. Oops, you are right. Tim made a big change to the range adaptor objects in P2281. Thank you for correcting me.=