public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/100621] New: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements @ 2021-05-16 5:49 hewillk at gmail dot com 2021-05-17 10:59 ` [Bug libstdc++/100621] " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: hewillk at gmail dot com @ 2021-05-16 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621 Bug ID: 100621 Summary: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: hewillk at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, in ranges#L3230, the _S_needs_cached_begin of reverse_view is defined as: static constexpr bool _S_needs_cached_begin = !common_range<_Vp> && !random_access_range<_Vp>; This definition seems incorrect, consider (https://godbolt.org/z/xfT5E4zK4): auto r = std::views::iota(0) | std::views::take(42) | std::views::drop(3); using V = decltype(r); static_assert(std::ranges::random_access_range<V>); static_assert(!std::ranges::common_range<V>); This r is not a common_range but a random_access_range, so the value of _S_needs_cached_begin is false, and because the following two asserts fail, the complexity of ranges::next is O(n): using I = decltype(r.begin()); using S = decltype(r.end()); static_assert(!std::assignable_from<I&, S>); static_assert(!std::sized_sentinel_for<S, I>); auto rr = r | std::views::reverse; This makes rr.begin() fails to meet its complexity requirements in [range.reverse.view#3]: "Remarks: In order to provide the amortized constant time complexity required by the range concept, this function caches the result within the reverse_view for use on subsequent calls.". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/100621] ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements 2021-05-16 5:49 [Bug libstdc++/100621] New: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements hewillk at gmail dot com @ 2021-05-17 10:59 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-17 11:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-17 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621 Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2021-05-17 CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/100621] ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements 2021-05-16 5:49 [Bug libstdc++/100621] New: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements hewillk at gmail dot com 2021-05-17 10:59 ` [Bug libstdc++/100621] " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-17 11:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-18 4:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-12 19:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-17 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- We need at least additionally check that the underlying random access range has a sized sentinel before eliding the cache. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/100621] ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements 2021-05-16 5:49 [Bug libstdc++/100621] New: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements hewillk at gmail dot com 2021-05-17 10:59 ` [Bug libstdc++/100621] " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-17 11:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-18 4:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-12 19:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-18 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03cf8d54e5c27cfe6b184cc96757cab30d8fa1df commit r12-855-g03cf8d54e5c27cfe6b184cc96757cab30d8fa1df Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> Date: Tue May 18 00:26:25 2021 -0400 libstdc++: Fix condition for memoizing reverse_view::begin() [PR100621] A range being a random access range isn't a sufficient condition for ranges::next(iter, sent) to have constant time complexity -- it must also have a sized sentinel. This adjusts the memoization condition for reverse_view accordingly. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/100621 * include/std/ranges (reverse_view::_S_needs_cached_begin): Set to true if the underlying non-common random-access range doesn't have a sized sentinel. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/100621] ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements 2021-05-16 5:49 [Bug libstdc++/100621] New: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements hewillk at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2021-05-18 4:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-12 19:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-12 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621 Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Fixed for GCC 12. This probably isn't suitable for backporting to 11/10 as it changes the layout of some specializations of reverse_view. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-12 19:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-05-16 5:49 [Bug libstdc++/100621] New: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity requirements hewillk at gmail dot com 2021-05-17 10:59 ` [Bug libstdc++/100621] " ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-17 11:04 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-18 4:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-12 19:08 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).