From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3C52E3858C36; Sun, 26 Nov 2023 20:47:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3C52E3858C36 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1701031678; bh=ffK5g2SarvV4k6KgxjhdspOuM6ajiMM8cjI6tdv9Vlo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SMZJZt8rJG0WRN2XQH3pYHFVoT8LxJL/NTuk/SDhJH+Ism3IfsXNzikWS8xAkMmAo FcRAjVPYYbJb50TACWtJRzhwVddvm2Bp5gyC/BmYymNSjqI2xed8QpCHeQt1vGPg3O vOHIpSrrzpTFXj/TF3CekDltUbJl0Ac6wiUMHvAo= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/100651] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Bad handling of optional, allocatable character argument Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 20:47:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100651 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.1, | |13.2.1, 14.0, 7.5.0, 8.5.0, | |9.5.0 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Updating the known-to-fail versions. I have doubts that this is a regression. The dump-tree even of 7.5.0 shows the same problem as the other listed versions.=