public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joachim at joameyer dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/100676] New: Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 11:13:22 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-100676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676 Bug ID: 100676 Summary: Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: joachim at joameyer dot de Target Milestone: --- As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 the use of __glibcxx_assert in the complex functions breaks using the complex header with Clang CUDA. The way Clang CUDA handles that might not be ideal, but the libstdc++ issue seems to be present anyways: In every use of __glibcxx_assert the function __failed_assertion is redeclared and btw. never defined, which might break other projects as well, and then is used as an assertion in constant evaluated contexts, as it is a non constexpr function. I wasn't able to come up with an entirely better approach so far, but I guess most of the issues, that I could think of so far, would be solved by moving the void __failed_assertion(); declaration out of the macro. This would fix the issues with Clang CUDA for example: https://cuda.godbolt.org/z/GTMnxez7j
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-19 11:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-19 11:13 joachim at joameyer dot de [this message] 2021-05-19 11:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/100676] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-20 10:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-20 20:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-02 13:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-06-02 13:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-100676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).