public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joachim at joameyer dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/100676] New: Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 11:13:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676

            Bug ID: 100676
           Summary: Redeclaring __failed_assertion() at every point of use
                    of __glibcxx_assert breaks Clang CUDA
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: joachim at joameyer dot de
  Target Milestone: ---

As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 the use of
__glibcxx_assert in the complex functions breaks using the complex header with
Clang CUDA. The way Clang CUDA handles that might not be ideal, but the
libstdc++ issue seems to be present anyways:

In every use of __glibcxx_assert the function __failed_assertion is redeclared
and btw. never defined, which might break other projects as well, and then is
used as an assertion in constant evaluated contexts, as it is a non constexpr
function.

I wasn't able to come up with an entirely better approach so far, but I guess
most of the issues, that I could think of so far, would be solved by moving the
void __failed_assertion(); declaration out of the macro.

This would fix the issues with Clang CUDA for example:
https://cuda.godbolt.org/z/GTMnxez7j

             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 11:13 joachim at joameyer dot de [this message]
2021-05-19 11:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/100676] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-20 10:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-20 20:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-02 13:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-02 13:45 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100676-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).